Harsh diplomatic action against Maldives could alienate citizens from India
The past one year
was significantly productive for India’s foreign policy with the India-Asean
commemorative summit, the initiative to connect with Central Asia, and a
maturing of relations with the US, besides building more balanced ties with
China. It was closer home that relations have been a bit rocky, from the
discomfort with Sri Lanka over the plight of the Sri Lankan Tamils and the
continuing political impasse in Nepal. But the developments in Maldives were the
biggest embarrassment for India’s foreign policy establishment.
Relations with other neighbours moved forward, including with Pakistan, when
visa rules were eased for some categories of applicants. Ties with Myanmar too
received an impetus with prime minister Manmohan Singh’s visit to Myanmar and
opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi’s visit to Delhi last year. Despite Suu Kyi’s
reservations about the Indian government’s efforts at strengthening ties with
the erstwhile military regime at the cost of the pro-democracy activists, her
visit to New Delhi opened the way for wider engagement with different sections
of the Myanmar’s society. In the case of Bangladesh too, the visit of opposition
leader Begum Khalida Zia expanded contact with opposition parties.
The political upheaval in Male with the ouster of president Nasheed, eventually
led to the cancellation of the biggest Indian project in the Maldives. New Delhi
has been seething over these latest developments; questions have even been
raised about the level of Indian aid that Maldives receives as budgetary
support. In recent weeks, visas have been tightened for Maldives nationals
travelling to India, which were earlier being issued gratis for Maldives
citizens, though that country charges a fee from Indian travellers. Indian
expatriate workers have been facing problems with the government confiscating
their visas and passports.
The Indian mission in Male is now strict about issuing visas. Maldives
nationals, who used to obtain a free 90-day tourist visa on arrival, have now
been advised to apply for appropriate visa in advance if their travel is for any
other reason, including for medical purposes, and it may now take up to a week
process. While India is within its rights to enforce visa norms, the sudden
tightening of procedures has hit the citizens of Maldives who visit India for
medical treatment and other purposes. The move is seen as retaliation to the
Maldives government cancelling the contract for the new airport.
The GMR project became a political football in Maldives’ political drama; it was
one of charges made by the opposition against President Nasheed’s government.
While GMR company won the bid for the airport project after an international
open tender, the ‘airport development fee’ it charged from travellers that
became a bone of contention. A Maldives court struck down the development charge
in 2011 (a similar controversy has raged over airport development charges at
GMR’s Delhi international airport). The government allowed GMR to deduct the
airport fees from its revenue sharing arrangement, but later cancelled the deal
when the charge drastically reduced its revenues.
In a tiny country like the Maldives, the question of Indian visas can become a
major issue for citizens for whom India is the nearest and cheapest destination
for medical treatment and higher studies. A heavy handed move that hurts
ordinary travellers is likely to be counterproductive at a time when the
country’s polity is going through a bitter political turmoil that is likely to
be resolved only when general elections are held and a new elected government is
in place.
In 1989, the Indian government was legally well within its right in closing
transit points on the India-Nepal border after the lapse of the trade and
transit treaty following trade disputes between the two countries. However, the
move hit common citizens of Nepal hard, causing enormous economic hardship with
rising prices and shortages of fuel and other essential items, resulting in a
major public relations disaster for the Indian government, as it was perceived
to be an economic blockade of a small landlocked country. New Delhi’s action in
Maldives could end up alienating the average citizen in that country.
(The writer is a
foreign affairs commentator)